no information available
Fans and disciples of Seymour Sarason all know that education reform needs a change in course Indeed, the daily practices of schools, education research, and US educational policy all need such a change Neither Professors Glazek and Sarason, nor anyone else, can give yet a complete description of what these changes would involve But when the change happens, the leaders of the change will all acknowledge their considerable debt tthis book The reason is that the needed change in school classrooms will be very hard trecognize as such unless these leaders are thoroughly familiar with the concept of a context of productive learning In this book, Glazek and Sarason collaborated on an extraordinarily daunting attempt tcreate and analyze a context of productive learning in which, simultaneously, Sarason was the student and Glazek the teacher and vice versa They attempted what must surely be a Mt Everest example of the concept: explanation of Einsteins famous formula, E=mc²áThe result should be of intense interest ta broad audience concerned with the present problems of science education as well as the nature of a context of productive learning -Kenneth G Wilson, H C Youngberg Trustees Distinguished Professor Nobel Laureate for Physics, 1982 Department of Physics, The OhiState University By making accessible and intelligible Einsteins theory of relativity, this remarkable book reveals tits readers the power and possibility of their own learning and, in doing so, brilliantly demonstrates the power and necessity of productive learning for everyone -Andy Hargreaves, Thomas More Brennan Chair in Education Lynch School of Education, Boston College Professors Glazek and Sarason have written a creative and instructive book that will be read for years tcome Drawing upon their backgrounds in physics and psychology, they support EinsteinÆs recommendations as tthe importance of the humanities The authors purpose is thelp readers acquire a substantive grasp of how Einstein accomplished what he did and the implications of this for educational reform The readers view of teaching and learning will be forever changed by the authors insights -Dale L Brubaker, Professor University of North Carolina This is an interesting and provocative book, written by a psychologist with several thousands of hours of observation and analysis of classroom teaching in public schools and a physicist The book starts with a critique of teaching in our schools and explains why educational reform has been sminimal in its effects The movie Mr Hollands Opus is used as a distinguisher between good and bad teaching methodology These chapters are followed by physics chapters on the foundation of Einsteins E=mc¦ The authors follow Einsteins thinking and use the features of light as a vehicle for their discussion They fold in stories and shy away from formulas, which they leave for appendices The book ends with a chapter on the philosophy of teaching The book is well written and eminently readable; the arguments are easy tfollow I recommend the book tanyone interested in the basis of modern physics and Einsteins role in it -Ernest M Henley, Professor Emeritus of Physics University of Washington Use the concept of productive learning treframe school reform!áWhy dpeople, college-bound or even in college, stay away in droves from courses in science, especially physics? Why dpeople know slittle about the significance of Einsteins contributions which require dramatic changes in how we understand ourselves, our world, and the entire universe? Why have educational reforms failed? In this book, twprofessors, one a particle physicist and the other a psychologist, confront these questions in a unique way based on the assumption that people can grasp on a non-superficial level what Einstein did in 1905 if, and only if, the features of productive learning are taken seriously The authors make clear that those features are applicable in teaching any subject matter by devoting twchapters tmusic and other arts In the case of science, they chose Einsteins work precisely because of the general belief that it cannot be assimilated by ordinary mortals whose brains are not wired tcomprehend the ways in which time, mass, energy, and the speed of light are seamlessly interrelated But this book is not an attempt tpopularize Einstein Its goal is tdemonstrate that features of the context of productive learning are applicable tany teacher-student relationship, regardless of whether the student is in first grade, in high school, or in college Einsteins work was about alignment of frames of reference of observers in physics A similar process of alignment between the minds of a student and a teacher is the vehicle of productive learning The book explains the analogy The authors discuss and emphasize that educational reform will continue tfail as long as the concept of learning is fuzzy and provides ndirection tthe teacher-student relationship Reform efforts will continue tfail unless and until they are based on a clear distinction between contexts of productive and unproductive learning